🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our children's youth". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to block their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," said a leading MEP driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust data".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. An organization set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering harmful online content suggests that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build tools that are safe and suitable for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, legislation is largely occurring at the state level amid federal inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various figures to mimic this lead, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

As this global debate evolves, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers around the world are less and less content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.